1. Introduction
The separator ACCULINNA is in operation
since 1996. High intensity primary beams of 7Li,
11B, 13C, 15N and 18O with energy values ranging
between 32 and 50 AMeV are delivered by the U-
400M cyclotron to the production target of the
separator. The secondary beams of 6He and 8He
nuclei with energies of about 25 AMeV allowed us
to gain new insights into the structure of neutron
halo nuclei through the study of one- and twoneutron
transfer reactions made with hydrogen
and helium targets. Such beams offer favorable
conditions for the production of so far unknown
particle-unstable nuclei beyond the neutron
drip line. For this purpose one could use one-step
one-proton and two-neutron transfer reactions
occurring when either 6He or 8He projectiles bombard
light targets. Due to a simple mechanism of
nucleon transfer between colliding nuclei, one
could anticipate for these reactions higher crosssections
and smaller background as compared to
transfer reactions with conventional beams. The
observation of a resonance state of 5H made with
the separator ACCULINNA using one-proton transfer 1H(6He, 2He)5H is one example, which proved the potential of radioactive beams in
this field.
The use of a tritium target in relevant experiments
could give a new dimension for the investigation
of light neutron-drip line nuclei. One
advantage of the tritium target is an extremely high
energy release obtained for a proton pick-up reaction.
An outstanding example is the reaction 8He + 3H → 7H + 4 He. It is, perhaps, the best one among
the very few other reactions, which one could use
to study the superheavy hydrogen isotope 7H.
The system 8He + 3H is notable for the absolute
record in terms of the neutron excess. As a result
of two-neutron transfer from triton to 8He, 10He
and proton could be obtained in the reaction exit
channel.
The present paper reports on the upgrade of
separator ACCULINNA, which allowed us to
enhance the radioactive beam intensity and purity
and to use a tritium target in experiments.
2. The separator upgrade
The separator ACCULINNA is installed at a
primary beam line of cyclotron U-400M.
Fig. 1. Lay-out of the upgraded separator ACCULINNA. F1 – the object plane; F2 – the intermediate dispersion plane; F3 – the achromatic focal plane; F4 – the second focal plane; 1 – the primary beam direction; 2 – the DEMON detector modules.
The achromatic ion-optical system (see Fig. 1) is optimized
for focusing fragments emerging from the
production target, placed in the object plane F1, to
the achromatic focal plane F3. The desired secondary
beams are separated according their magnetic
rigidity with the aid of magnets D1 and D2.
A wedge-shaped degrader installed in the intermediate
dispersive focal plane F2 helps to remove
background from the selected beam. Beryllium
wedges with mean thicknesses ranging from 55 to
370 mg/cm2 have been manufactured to replace the
aluminum wedges being in use up to now. This
increased the secondary beam intensity by a factor
of 1.2. The maximum increase (by a factor of 1.5)
was obtained for a 8 AMeV 8He beam delivered to
focal plane F3.
Essential is that the production target withstands
the maximum primary beam currents,
which is up to 10 pμA. In case of 35 AMeV 11B
ions hitting a 350-mg/cm2 stationary beryllium
target cooled with water the maximum beam current
could be 2 pμA. The new rotating beryllium
target cooled with water allowed us to move the
current limit to 5 pμA, at least. Wheels of 50 mm
in diameter rotating with a speed of 2 turns per
second worked well at this beam current at the
target thickness ranging from 92 to 720 mg/cm2.
The separator upgrade caused an extension of
the beam line. This was implemented through the
use of two doublets and one triplet formed by
magnetic quadrupole lenses (lenses from Q9–Q15 in Fig. 1).
The target intended for secondary
beams was moved from the plane F3 to the plane
F4 located beyond the 2-m concrete wall of the U-
400M hall. As a result, the radiation background
around the reaction chamber was reduced drastically.
An important acquiring was the possibility
to work with neutron detectors in the proximity of
the reaction chamber. Another upgrade consisted
in the increase of the secondary beam capture solid
angle. This was reached by means of cross-shaped
vacuum pipes installed in quadrupole lenses Q1–
Q15.Finally, the primary beam focusing was improved
to secure a 90% transmission to a 5-mm
spot located in the plane F1 where the production
target is placed. The acquired ion optical separator
parameters are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. The beam line characteristics of upgraded separator ACCULINNA
|
Maximum magnetic rigidity
|
Tm |
3.6 |
|
Horizontal acceptance angle
|
mrad |
20 |
|
Vertical acceptance angle
|
mrad |
14 |
|
Momentum acceptance
|
% |
4.2 - 8.4 |
|
Intermediate focal plane F2
|
- |
- |
|
Horizontal magnification
|
- |
0.5 |
|
Vertical magnification
|
- |
2.0 |
|
Momentum dispersion
|
mm/% |
4.0 - 18.0 |
|
Momentum resolution (FWHM) *)
|
- |
3x10-3 |
|
Achromatic focal plane F3
|
- |
- |
|
Momentum dispersion
|
mm/% |
- |
|
Horizontal and vertical magnification
|
- |
1.0 |
|
Horizontal RIB size (FWHM)
|
mm |
8 |
|
Vertical RIB size (FWHM)
|
mm |
10 |
|
Momentum dispersion
|
mm/% |
- |
|
Horizontal RIB size (FWHM)
|
mm |
20 |
|
Vertical RIB size (FWHM)
|
mm |
16 |
|
Horizontal acceptance
|
pi x mm x mrad |
60 |
|
Vertical acceptance
|
pi x mm x mrad |
43 |
*) A 3-mm slit is installed in plane F2. Second-order aberrations are taken into account.
We tested the upgraded separator with a beam
of 35 AMeV 11B ions bombarding a 350 mg/cm2
thick beryllium production target into the beam
spot 6 mm diameter. At a primary beam intensity
of 2 pμA we focused in a 2.0-cm circle in plane F4
6*105 6He ions with energy 25 AMeV. The
number of 8He ions delivered to plane F4 will be
by a factor of 80 less than the one obtained
for 6He. Primary 7Li ions routinely accelerated at
U-400M to energy 34 AMeV are by a factor of 5
more effective than 11B for producing the 6He
beam. Thus, from the point of view of maximum
beam intensity for 6He and 8He ions the
optimum primary beams are, respectively, 7Li and
11B.
Assuming an intensity of 10 pμA for any of
the two beams, we estimate intensities of 107
and 3*104 s-1, which one will have for 6He and
8He beams, respectively.
The extension of the separator beam line improved
conditions for the time-of-flight (TOF)
measurement made for individual ions on an 8.5-m
flight path between the focal planes F3 and F4.
The TOF measurements made for individual beam
ions with a resolution of 300 ps (FWHM) leads to
a precision of 0.5% in the energy determination. In
case of fragmentation 35 AMeV 11B primary beam
momentum spread of the secondary beams measured
by the TOF method was fixed on 4.8% and
4.2% (FWHM) for 6He and 8Li, respectively. Another
advantage of this straight line is that, by
placing the diaphragm in plane F3, the secondary
beam selected for delivering to the target is
additionally purified. With an 8-mm diaphragm in
the plane F3 we transferred to F4 as mach as 60%
of secondary 25 AMeV 6He ions. The admixture
of the main common contaminant beams of 3H
and 8Li were at a level of 7% and 13%, respectively.
In Fig. 2 the horizontal and vertical phase
space diagrams of the 6He beam at the F4 focus
plane measured by two multiwire proportional
chambers installed at the distances of 90 and 25 cm
before physics target position F4 respectively were
shown. The capture solid angle extracted from
these data was measured to be of 0.9 msr for 6-mm
primary beam spot on the beryllium target. The
beam sizes on the physics target F4 were equal to
20 and 16 mm (FWHM) in the horizontal and
vertical directions, respectively, and the angular
divergences were of about 0.75° (FWHM) in both
directions.
Fig. 2. The upper left and right plots show the two-dimensional
transverse phase space diagrams, respectively. Below them one
can see their projections on the corresponding axes.
3. Liquid tritium target
We designed and manufactured a liquid tritium
target to be used in the study of hydrogen and
helium isotopes lying beyond the neutron drip
line. A 0.4-mm thick tritium target cell was
equipped with 10 μm stainless steel entrance and
exit windows hermetically welded to the cell body.
For the sake of safety this cell was embedded
into a protective volume also supplied with 10 μm
stainless steel windows. The window diameters
were 10 and 20 mm, respectively. The target
structure allowed one to detect reaction products
emitted in forward and backward directions
within two cones with full opening angles of 90°.
The space between the walls of the target cell and
protective chamber was pumped to a stationary
pressure of 106 mbar and was open to a Ti getter
having a capacity large enough to absorb the
whole tritium in an emergency case. The destruction
pressure of the 10-mm target windows
was ~20 bar. In real operation conditions the gas
pressure in the target cell did not exceed 1 bar.
Hydrogen isotopes were stored on 238U in a
chemically compound state. The residual gases
were released to fill a standard evacuated volume
connected with the target cell to a maximum
pressure of 1.0 bar. In the case of tritium, this
was achieved by heating the uranium source to
680–705 K. When the target was cooled to 18–21
K a gas pressure of 250–300 mbar was set in this
volume. The gas recovery proceeded through reverse
absorption on the uranium source cooled to
room temperature. The stainless steel bottle containing
the tritium source was inserted into a
protective volume evacuated by an autonomous
Ti getter. This volume, as well as one housing the
target cell, made the second barrier for tritium
leaks. The third barriers were the reaction chamber
and a separate chamber, in which the tritium
source inserted into its protective volume were
installed. Separate oil-free pumps served as the
two third-barrier volumes. Pipelines connecting
the source with the recovery system and reaction
chamber had two protection barriers. The outlet
gas purity monitors were coupled to additional
tritium absorbers to guarantee the safe operation
of the whole set-up.
4. Experimental set-up
The beam line of separator ACCULINNA was
used to deliver a triton beam accelerated by the U-
400M cyclotron to the tritium target. Using diaphragms
and slits set in positions F1 and F2 we
reduced the angular divergence and energy spread
of the primary triton beam to FWHM values of 7
mrad and 0.3 MeV, respectively. Finally the triton
beam with a typical intensity of 3*107 s1 was
focused to a halo-free 5-mm spot on the tritium
target. The total beam energy, 57.5 MeV in the
medium target plane, and the beam energy spread,
330 keV, were estimated in independent ways
from the separator tuning and by measuring tritons
elastically scattered from target nuclei (tritium,
hydrogen and iron).
The 5H systems could be formed as a result of 2n
transfers in t + t reaction. We used two detector
telescopes for charged reaction products. In addition,
we used 49 scintillation modules of the TOF
neutron spectrometer DEMON for the neutron
detection. The first telescope intended for higher
energy products (e.g. protons with energy < 35
MeV) involved one 400-μm and two 1-mm thick
Si strip detectors and a 7-mm thick Li drifted Si
detector. The telescope was set to detect reaction
products emitted in an angular range of 18° ≤
θlab ≤ 32°. The second telescope consisted of one
70-μm, one 400-μm and two 1-mm thick Si
strip detectors. It was optimized to detect relatively
slow tritons originating from the 5H decay and
covered an angular range of 15°≤ θlab ≤ 39°. The
array of DEMON modules installed behind the
triton telescope at a distance of 2.5 m from
the target covered angular range of θlab = 37°
± 19°. Data acquisition was triggered when time
correlated signals appeared from the two telescopes.
Thus, using the stored raw data we could
analyze events where a proton, triton and neutron
originating from process t + t → p + 5H + p + t + n + n were detected. The missing mass energy
spectrum of the 5H system was produced as a result
of analysis made for the proton energy measured
at different angle with respect to the beam
axis. The instrumental resolution achieved for the
searched 5H resonance states was about 400 keV.
5. Conclusion
The separator showed reliable operation parameters
during the one-month period of the t + t
experiment. The beam energy was stable within
0.2%. The absolute value of the beam energy was
determined with the same accuracy from the
known magnetic rigidity of the second separator
dipole (D2). This will be valid also for the mean
energy of secondary beams (e.g. the beams of 6He
and 8He nuclei). The instrumental resolution
(~ 400 keV), which was achieved in the study of 5H
resonance states, is typical for other reactions
planned with 6He and 8He projectiles. The feasibility
of experiments made with this resolution is
guaranteed by precise measurements of energy and
angle made for reaction products emitted from the
target. Angular measurements will not limit the
resolution because tracking the trajectories of individual
incident ions allows one to measure the
trajectory angles for reaction products with an
accuracy of 0.2°.
Full text of this article may be found at Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 204(2003) 114–118.